Havlovska Ya. Yu., Lytvynenko N. V., Shkodina A. D., Havlovskyi O. L.

DYNAMICS COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS RECOVERY IN THE ACUTE PERIOD OF DIFFERENT SUBTYPES OF ISCHEMIC STROKE AFTER SYSTEMIC THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY


About the author:

Havlovska Ya. Yu., Lytvynenko N. V., Shkodina A. D., Havlovskyi O. L.

Heading:

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE

Type of article:

Scentific article

Annotation:

Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide, the leading cause of disability, and a significant financial burden. Currently, 3 to 4% of the total health care costs of countries are spent on stroke treatment. Studies of stroke survivors have shown that approximately 10% may develop dementia within the first year after a stroke. However, today the issue of early recovery of patients with acute cerebrovascular diseases and the phenomenology of the development of complications, in particular cognitive disorders in the acute period, is an acute issue, which would allow optimizing personalized strategies for the treatment of such patients. The goal is to evaluate the dynamic changes in the cognitive sphere in patients in the acute II period with atherothrombotic and cardioembolic subtypes after thrombolysis. We conducted a prospective two-center study of patients in the acute phase of ischemic stroke. 89 patients were included in the study: group 1aA (n=32) – patients with atherothrombotic subtype of ischemic stroke (IS), who were subject to thrombolytic therapy (sTLT); group 1aK (n=16) – patients with cardioembolic subtype IS who were to undergo sTLT; group 2 (n=20) –healthy patients with no history of acute cerebrovascular disorders (control group). Assessment of cognitive functions was carried out using international standardized scales, in particular: Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). We established statistically significant differences between the examined groups for 1 day according to indicators of time orientation (р=0.007), attention and calculation (р<0.001), perception and memory (р=0.001) and the total MMSE score (р<0.001). Statistically significant differences were found between the examined groups on the 14th day in the indicators of attention and calculation (p<0.001) and in the total MMSE score (p<0.001). No significant differences in ∆MMSE were found between groups 1aA and 1aK (р=0.701). In patients with cardioembolic subtype IS, the presence of positive dynamics in the acute period was established, while in patients with atherothrombotic subtype it was not detected. Along with this, the difference in recovery of various domains of the cognitive sphere in the acute period according to subtype IS was noted. This is how we discovered. that the dynamic changes of cognitive functions in the acute IS period after sTLT vary depending on the clinical subtype.

Tags:

cognitive disorders,dementia,thrombolysis,ischemic stroke

Bibliography:

  1. Delva M, Lytvynenko N, Delva I. Factors associated with post-stroke fatigue during the second half year after stroke. Georgian Med News. 2017 Nov;272:59-64. DOI: https://doi.org/29227260.
  2. Tadi P, Lui F. Acute Stroke. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
  3. Corrao S, Lo Coco D, Lopez G. Cognitive impairment and stroke in elderly patients. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Mar 24;12:105-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S75306.
  4. Einstad MS, Saltvedt I, Lydersen S, Ursin MH, Munthe-Kaas R, Ihle-Hansen H, et al. Associations between post-stroke motor and cognitive function: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:103. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1186/s12877-021-02055-7.
  5. Shkodina A, Tarianyk K, Boiko D. Influence of sleep disturbances on cognitive decline in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Ukr Sci Med Youth J. 2020;117:58-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32345/USMYJ.3(117).2020.58-67.
  6. Makin SDJ, Turpin S, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM. Cognitive impairment after lacunar stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, prevalence and comparison with other stroke subtypes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:893-900. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-303645.
  7. Broome LJ, Battle CE, Lawrence M, Evans PA, Dennis MS. Cognitive Outcomes following Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:2868-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.07.048.
  8. Momosaki R, Yasunaga H, Kakuda W, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Abo M. Very Early versus Delayed Rehabilitation for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;42:41-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000444720.
  9. Zhao Q, Wang X, Wang T, Dmytriw AA, Zhang X, Yang K, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation interventions after stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Syst Rev. 2021;10:66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01607-7.
  10. Kalaria RN, Akinyemi R, Ihara M. Stroke injury, cognitive impairment and vascular dementia. Biochim Biophys Acta – Mol Basis Dis. 2016;1862:915-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.01.015.
  11. Lattanzi S, Coccia M, Pulcini A, Cagnetti C, Galli FL, Villani L, et al. Endovascular treatment and cognitive outcome after anterior circulation ischemic stroke. Sci Rep. 2020;10:18524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-020-75609-1.
  12. Torrisi M, Bonanno L, Corallo F, Formica C, Giorgianni R, Marra A, et al. The effect of intravenous thrombolytic therapy on post stroke depression and cognitive dysfunction: A 3-months follow up study. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022;29:967-70. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1829 625.
  13. Meyer M, Murie-Fernandez M, Hall R, Liu Y, Fang J, Salter K, et al. Assessing the Impact of Thrombolysis on Progress through Inpatient Rehabilitation after Stroke: A Multivariable Approach. Int J Stroke. 2012;7:460-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00729.x.
  14. Pan Y-T, Lee J-D, Lin Y-H, Huang Y-C, Weng H-H, Lee M, et al. Comparisons of outcomes in stroke subtypes after intravenous thrombolysis. Springerplus. 2016;5:47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1666-y.
  15. Fuentes B, Martínez-Sánchez P, de Leciñana MA, Egido J, Reig-Roselló G, Díaz-Otero F, et al. Efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis according to stroke subtypes: the Madrid Stroke Network data. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19:1568-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 1331.2012.03790.x.

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 1 (168), 2023 year, 131-141 pages, index UDK 616.831-005.1:616.895-085

DOI: