ORGANIZATION OF MEDICAL REHABILITATION IN THE LEADING COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD

Shevchuk V. I., Yavorovenko O. B., Beliayeva N. M., Kurylenko I. V., Androsova N. S.

LITERATURE REVIEWS

Scentific article

The purpose of this work was to study the experience of organization of medical rehabilitation of patients in the leading countries of the world. Object and methods of investigation. The analysis of the literary sources on the experience of the organization of medical rehabilitation in Austria, Belgium, Great Britain, Israel, the Netherlands, France, India, Germany, Poland, the Russian Federation, the USA, Finland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Sweden and Japan was performed. Used methods: monographic, structural-logical analysis. Results. The conducted analysis shows that the each country in the organization of medical rehabilitation focuses on its national characteristics. At the same time the leading countries of the world have common features on themethodology, the form of organization of rehabilitation institutions, the stages of the rehabilitation process, the staffing of specialists, the basic list of services, the methodology for assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation, and the maximum approach of services to people with disabilities. Special attention is paid to the patient’s social and everyday activity, his personal responsibility for his health. There are two-level rehabilitation centers in the leading countries of the world. Different types of vocational rehabilitation centers contain the same departments for rehabilitation (medical, psychological, social, professional), but the volume of medical rehabilitation, depending on the volume and content of their activities, is different. Specialized rehabilitation teams have become widespread in the leading countries of the world. WHO suggested «community-based-rehabilitation». The assessment of the effectiveness of rehabilitation is carried out mainly by scales, tests and special questionnaires. Conclusions. Knowledge of the experience of other countries allows us to take into account the successes and failures in the system of construction of medical rehabilitation in Ukraine. Today, the urgent need to reform the system of medical and social rehabilitation of persons with disabilities has risen, based on the best international experience, where the modern concept of disability has a clear rehabilitation focus.

medical rehabilitation, persons with disabilities, the organization of medical rehabilitation, international experience.

1.  World Health Organization & World Bank. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2011. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44575
2. Yunusov FA, Gayger G, Mikus E, Manuvald O. Organizatsiya mediko-sotsialnoy reabilitatsii za rubezhom. M.: OOF Sotsialnoe razvitie Rossii; 2008. 332 s. [in Russian]
3. Petrova NG, Epelman BV. Struktura, problemy i osnovnyie napravleniya uluchsheniya okazaniya mediko-sotsialnoy pomoschi v usloviyah krupnogo goroda (na primere Sankt-Peterburga). Mediko-sotsialnaya ekspertiza i reabilitatsiya. 2011;1:7-9. [in Russian].
4. Tulsky DS, Carlozzi N, Cella D. Advances in Outcomes Measurement in Rehabilitation Medicine: Current Initiatives from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;92(10):1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j. apmr.2011.07.202
5.  White Book On Physical And Rehabilitation Medicine In Europe. European Journal Of Physical And Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018 April;54:2.
6.  Saryiev MR. Istoriya sotsialnoy podderzhki invalidov v SShA. Fizika. Tehnologii. Innovatsii. Sb. nauch. trudov. Ekaterinburg: UrFU. 2015;1:330- 6. [in Russian].
7.  Perehudova TV. Instytutsionalne zabezpechennia realizatsii prav invalidiv: dosvid rozvynenykh krain ta stan v Ukraini. Ekonomika: realii chasu. 2015;4(20):41-51. [in Ukrainian].
8.  Prilipko NS. Sovershenstvovanie organizatsionno-metodicheskih printsipov meditsinskoy reabilitatsii vzroslogo naseleniya [dissertatsia]. M.; 2013. 554 s. [in Russian].
9. Perk J, Graham I. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012): the fifth joint task force of the European society of cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19:585- 667.
10. Zhang Y, Cao HX, Jiang P, Tang HQ. Cardiac rehabilitation in acute myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: A community-based study Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(8):e9785. Published online 2018 Feb 23. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009785
11. Sledzevska IK. Pryntsypy reabilitatsii khvorykh pislia perenesenoho infarktu miokarda. Interviu; rozmovu viv A. Martynovych. Vashe zdorovia [Internet]. Dostupno: http://health-ua.com/article/18030-printcipi-reabltatc-hvorih-pslya-perenesenogo-nfarktu-mokarda [in Ukrainian].
12.  Shestakov VP, Svintsov AN, Rocheva YaS. Sotsiologicheskiy monitoring soblyudeniya prav invalidov v ramkah Konventsii OON o pravah invalidov. Mediko-sotsialnaya ekspertiza i reabilitatsiya. 2015;18(3):41-6. [in Russian].
13.  Melin J, Årestedt K. The Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ): psychometric evaluation and revision for use in neurological rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jan;8:1-8. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jeanette_Melin3 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1528303
14. Guseva NK, Sokolov VA, Doyutova MV, Sokolova IA. Nekotoryie voprosyi modernizatsii gosudarstvennoy sistemy mediko-sotsialnoy ekspertizyi i reabilitatsii invalidov. Mediko-sotsialnaya ekspertiza i reabilitatsiya. 2014;17(1):36-40. [in Russian].
15. Holstege MS, Zekveld IG, Caljouw MA, Peerenboom PB, van BR, Gussekloo J, et al. Relationship of patient volume and service concentration with outcome in geriatric rehabilitation. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(10):731-5.
16.  Community-based rehabilitation and the health care referral services: a guide for programme managers. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1994 [Internet]. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1994/WHO_RHB_94.1.pdf
17. Golik VA, Moroz EN, Pogorelova SA. Ispolzovanie Mezhdunarodnoy klassifikatsii funktsionirovaniya, ogranicheniy zhiznedeyatelnosti i zdorovya v ekspertnoy nevrologicheskoy praktike. Mezhdunarodnyiy nevrologicheskiy zhurnal. 2011;5(43):136-42. [in Russian].
18. Putman K, De Wit L. European comparison of stroke rehabilitation. In: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):20-6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19443344 DOI: 10.1310/tsr1601-20
19. Holyk V. Reabilitatsiia: povne perezavantazhennia chy zmina dekoratsii? Interviu pro systemu reabilitatsii v Ukraini; rozmovu vela S. Ternova. Vashe zdorovia. 2018;01/02 12 sichnya:6-8. [in Ukrainian].

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 1 Part 2 (149), 2019 year, 51-55 pages, index UDK 614.2.364

10.29254/2077-4214-2019-1-2-149-51-55