COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICIENCY DIFFERENT CHEMOMODIFICATION SCHEMES OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH LOCAL CANCER HEADS AND NECK

Artiukh S. V.

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE

Scentific article

Every year, more than 500,000 new cases of head and neck cancer are recorded, but about 40.0 % of patients with this pathology don’t live past one year after the diagnosis. This is primarily due to the fact that in most cases (60.0 %) the disease is already diagnosed in locally advanced stages (III, IVa, IVb) despite the fact that head and neck cancer is dominated by visual forms. At present, the standard of treatment for patients with inoperable locally advanced head and neck cancer is chemoradiotherapy in the classical dose fractionation mode with chemomodification with cisplatin. But this regimen is toxic, therefore, it has significant restrictions on use, such as the age of the patient over 70 years, low somatic status, concomitant heart, kidney and liver disease. That is why an urgent need is present to develop new methods of chemoradiation therapy, which could improve the efficiency of complex treatment and reduce overall toxicity. One of the ways in which this result could be achieved is by using chronomodulated irradiation and chemo-drug administration. The paper presents the results of a study on the efficacy and toxicity of various chemomodification regimens of radiotherapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The study involved 108 patients, who have been divided into 3 groups. In the first group, patients received chronomodulated radiochemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil in the dose hypofractionation mode (n = 39), in the second – radiotherapy in the classical dose fractionation mode with cisplatin (n = 34), in the third – independent radiation therapy (n = 35). All patients received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy on a linear accelerator Clinac 600 C with photon energy 6 MeV to an isoeffective total focal dose of 60.0-70.0 Gy. The evaluation of the immediate response to treatment was based on the review and methods of visualization of the tumor cell (CT, MRI) using the criteria of RECIST v.1.1. The obtained data was processed in statistic software STATISTICA v. 12 using nonparametric methods for a small number of elements of the sample population. Also, the overall one-year and two-year survival was studied using the Kaplan-Meier method and life time tables. The obtained results were compared on the basis of the probability criterion of log-rank, p-criterion of significance of statistical differences. In all cases, the difference was considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. The direct results of treatment in radiochemotherapy groups were shown to be equal and amounted to 77.0 % with 5-fluorouracil and 73.5 % with cisplatin (p = 0.35). These rates exceed the results of radiotherapy only treatment – 58.2 % (p < 0.05). Two-year survival rate was higher when using the developed method of chronomodulated radiochemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil in the dose hypofractionation mode than when using radiotherapy alone – (46.2 ± 8.0) versus (25.7 ± 7.4) %, respectively (p = 0.03), whereas, when using radiotherapy with cisplatin, this figure was (38.2 ± 8.3) % (p = 0.13). Median survival when using chronomodulated radiochemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil was (17.5 ± 3.6) months versus (13.2 ± 3.2) in the group using radiochemotherapy with cisplatin (p < 0.0001). The toxicity of therapy is of great importance in the treatment of the patient, because the final result of the process depends on it. Thus, expressed manifestations of unwanted events led to the patient’s refusal from further treatment or to deterioration of their general condition, hematological parameters, appearance of pronounced local reactions, which required the doctor to stop treatment before stabilizing the patient’s condition, and in some cases, their hospitalization. In our study, grade 3-4 radiation mucositis was more commonly observed with cisplatin (47.0 %). With the use of 5-fluorouracil and with only radiotherapy, the development rate of grade 3 radiation mucositis was 35.9 and 25.7 %, respectively (p = 0.17), and no case of grade 4 mucositis was recorded. Dyspeptic events were significantly more frequent in the radiochemotherapy group with cisplatin – 58.8 vs. 5.1 % with chronomodulated administration of 5-fluorouracil (p < 0.0001). This led to a more than 10.0 % decrease in body weight in most patients receiving cisplatin. Concerning hematological toxicity, in the case of cisplatin, grade 2-3 leukopenia was registered in 14.7 % of cases, compared with 5.1 % with the use of chronomodulated administration of 5-fluorouracil. Thus, by analyzing the immediate and long-term results of treatment, there was no significant difference in the indices when using the developed method of chronomodulated radiochemotherapy in comparison with traditional radiochemotherapy with cisplatin. However, high toxicity of radiochemotherapy with cisplatin was noted, in contrast to chronomodulated administration of 5-fluorouracil. That is why it is expedient to use the regimen with 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with reduced somatic status and elderly patients.

head and neck cancer, chronomodulated therapy, hypofraction, chemoradiotherapy, radiation toxicity

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21387
2. Fedorenko ZP, Hulak LO, Mykhailovych YuY. Rak v Ukraini, 2015-2016. Zakhvoriuvanist, smertnist, pokaznyky diialnosti onkolohichnoi sluzhby. Biul. natsionalnoho kantser-reiestru Ukrainy, № 18. К.; 2017. 120 s. [in Ukrainian].
3. Chin D, Boyle GM, Porceddu S, Theile DR, Parsons PG, Coman WB. Head and neck cancer: past, present and future. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2006 Jul;6(7):1111-8. DOI: 10.1586/14737140.6.7.1111
4. Aliyeva SB, Matyakin EG, Zaderenko IA, Zharkov IA. Khirurgicheskoye lecheniye bolnykh s ostatochnymi i retsidivnymi opukholyami posle radikalnykh kursov khimioluchevoy terapii raka glotki. Vestnik RONTs im. N. N. Blokhina RAMN. 2009. s. 28-31. [in Russiаn].
5. Gregoire V, Lefebvre JL, Licitra L, Felip E. On behalf of the EHNS–ESMO–ESTRO Guidelines Working Group. ESMO guideline working group. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. 2010;21(5):184-6. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq185
6. Denaro N, Russi EG, Merlano MC. Strategies for non-resectable head and neck cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2013;14(4):492-504. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-013-0260-6
7. Das S, Thomas S, Pal SK, Isiah R, John S. Hypofractionated Palliative Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Inoperable Head and Neck Cancer: CMC Vellore Experience. Indian J Palliat Care. 2013;19(2):93-8. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1075.116709
8. Ko C, Citrin D. Radiotherapy for the management of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Dis. 2009;15(2):12132. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2008.01495.x
9. Sukhina EN, Svinarenko AV, Starenkiy VP, Grishchenko TP, Nasonova AN, Nesterenko AS. Angioblastomnyy effekt i toksichnost khronoradioterapii raka pryamoy kishki i sheyki matki. URZh. 2015;XXІIІ(2):97-101. [in Russiаn].
10. Svinarenko AV, Grishchenko TP, Sukhina EN. Khronomodulirovannaya radiokhimioterapiya kak sposob snizheniya toksichnosti lecheniya raka pryamoy kishki. Tekhnogenna bezpeka. 2011;157(169):83-7. [in Russiаn].

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 2 (144), 2018 year, 131-135 pages, index UDK 616.22–006.61–08-039.76–059 +615.849.114

10.29254/2077-4214-2018-2-144-131-135