INTRAORAL GALITIOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH UNKNOWN ORTHOPEDIC STRUCTURES

Udod A. A., Glіvynska A. O.

DENTISTRY

Scentific article

Objective: assessment of intraoral halitosis in patients with non-removable orthopedic structures. Object and methods of the study: 128 patients (72 women and 56 men) aged 35-55 years with non-removable orthopedic constructions in the oral cavity made by various technologies were examined. After the examination, 3 groups were formed from the patients. The first group consisted of 45 people with non-removable stamped-brazed dentures. The second group consisted of 39 people with non-removable, bridged, solid-cast dentures from cobaltchromium and chromium-nickel alloys. Patients of the third group (44 people) were put on by non-removable, solid bridges of titanium. The state of hygiene of the oral cavity was evaluated using the Green-Vermilion index. Halitosis was detected using the organoleptic method of R. Seemann (2002). Quantitative evaluation of volatile sulfur compounds in the exhaled air was carried out with a Halimeter (Interscan Corporation, USA). Results of the study. It has been established that the presence of non-removable dentures negatively affects the hygienic state of the oral cavity. The average value of the OHI-S hygiene index in patients was 0.99 ± 0.08 points, which corresponded to a satisfactory hygienic condition. The most pronounced disorders were observed in patients of the first group (with stamped-brazed prostheses) – hygiene level 1.29 ± 0.18 points; 60% of patients felt bad breath at a distance of 10 cm (the first level of halitosis), in 33.3% – at a distance of 30 cm (the second level of halitosis). Mild calorie (a reading of a halimeter in the range of 121-160 ppb) was recorded in 57.8% of patients in the first group, an average degree of halitosis (161-200 ppb) in 33.3% of patients; A severe degree (more than 200 ppb) was detected in 4.4%. Patients of the third group had a higher level of oral hygiene (0.64 ± 0.11 points); 65.9% of patients with fresh breath were detected; In 25% of the subjects, an unpleasant odor was felt at a distance of 10 cm; in 9,1% the second level of halitosis (unpleasant odor at a distance of 30 cm) was due to additional factors – difficulty in the eruption of third molars and complicated caries. The normal parameters of halimetry in the third group were found in 65.9% of cases. Malignancy of mild degree (121-160 ppb) was registered in 25% of patients of the third group. The average degree of halitosis (161-200ppb) was noted in 9.1% of patients with additional etiological factors of development of halitosis. Wires. As a result of the study, the relationship between the hygienic state of the oral cavity, the material and the technology of manufacturing of non-removable orthopedic structures and the degree of intraoral halitosis expression was revealed.

halitosis, fixed orthopedic constructions, hygiene of the oral cavity

1. Ulytovskyi SB. Otsenka stepeny vyrazhennosty halytoza. DentArt. 2004;4:27-9. [in Russiаn].
2. Ashwath B, Vijayalakshmi R, Malini S. Self-perceived halitosis and oral hygiene habits among under-graduate dental students. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014;18(3):357-60.
3. Nazir MA, Almas Kh, Majeed MI. The prevalence of halitosis (oral malodor) and associated factors among dental students and interns, Lahore, Pakistan. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(4):480-5.
4. Haranina TS, Zhytariuk LV, Krasniuk IP. Halitoz ta mozhlyvosti yoho korektsii. Bukovynskyi medychnyi visnyk. 2012;16,2(62):43-6. [in Ukrainian].
5. Sidelnikova LF, Dudnikova MO. Obgruntuvannia vyboru zasobiv i metodiv indyvidualnoi hihiieny porozhnyny rota u patsiientiv, yaki khvoriiut na halitoz, u riznykh klinichnykh sytuatsiiakh. Novyny sto-matolohii. 2011;4:33-6. [in Ukrainian].
6. Petrushanko TO, Ilenko NV. Osoblyvosti likvidatsii oralnykh faktoriv halitozu. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh. 2010;2(2):108-9. [in Ukrainian].
7. Seemann R. Gestion de l’halitose au cabinet dentaire: Résultats d’un atelier de consensus international. Swiss dental journal. 2014;124(12):13339.
8. Solovev AA. Dyahnostyka, klynycheskye pryznaky halytoza y metody eho ustranenyia [avtoreferat]. M.; 2007. 22 s. [in Russiаn].
9. Kotov KS. Sroky reabylytatsyy patsyentov s syndromom zhzhenyia rta, vyzvannym halvanozom. Fundamentalnye yssledovanyia. 2015;16:1170-3. [in Russiаn].
10. Ovcharenko EN. Yzmenenye mykrobyotsenoza rotovoi zhydkosty pod vozdeistvyem kobaltokhromovykh y nykelekhromovykh splavov ortopedycheskykh konstruktsyi u patsyentov s sakharnym dyabetom 2 typa. Zhurnal Hrodnenskoho hosudarstvennoho medytsynskoho unyversyteta. 2014;1:39-41. [in Russiаn].
11. Urukov YuN, Moskovskyi AV, Vokulova YuA. Zabolevanyia slyzystoi obolochky polosty rta, obuslovlennye materyalamy zubnykh protezov. Sovremennye problemy nauky y obrazovanyia. 2015;6. Dostupno: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=23012 (data obrashchenyia: 10.05.2018). [in Russiаn].
12. Surzhanskyi SK, Sheliakova IP. Otsenka effektyvnosty zubnykh protezov yz tytana. Materialy Miedzynarodowej konferencji «Dynamica naukowych Badan-2007». Tym 7. Medycyna. Nauk biologicznych. Fizyczna kultura i sport. Przemysl: Nauka i studia. 2007. s. 9-14. [in Russiаn].
13. Ianishen IV, Maslovskyi OS. Halitoz yak problema klinichnoi stomatolohii: chastota i tiazhkist u patsiientiv na etapakh ortopedychnoho likuvannia. Medytsyna sohodni i zavtra. 2015;1:126-9. [in Ukrainian].

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 2 (144), 2018 year, 382-384 pages, index UDK 616.314-76-085.47

10.29254/2077-4214-2018-2-144-382-384