COMPOSITION ANALYSIS OF SOIL STREPTOMYCETES ENZYMES

Pogorelova A. M., Sokolova I. Ye., Vinogradova K. O., Gavrilyuk V. G., Sklyar T. V.

MICROBIOLOGY

Scentific article

Streptomycetes have for a long time attracted attention of researchers in the fields of industrial microbiology, biotechnology and genetic engineering as producers of various nutrients. At present, almost 17 % of the biologically active of microbial secondary metabolites (about 7600 of the 43000 known) are isolated from streptomycetes. Nowadays, the products of streptomycete biosynthesis are used in various fields: in agriculture – for the treatment and prevention of bacterial and fungal infections, as growth stimulators and additives in animal feed, etc.; in the food industry – at canning of foodstuff with the maximum preservation of nutrients; in scientific research – to inhibit certain stages of biochemical transformations, cell destruction in order to isolate subcellular structures, in the cultivation of viruses, in genetic research, etc. Some of the main compounds that synthesize streptomycetes are enzymes, including hydrolytic, in particular proteinases, amylase, lipase, cellulase, DNAses, lytic enzymes and others. Lytic enzymes, by acting on the substrate, can be divided into bacteriolytic, myco- and yeast-elitic. Due to the lability of the enzymatic apparatus, members of the genus Streptomyces have a high antagonistic activity, which suppress the activity of other bacteria and fungi. Significant biosynthetic potential and incredible heterogeneity of streptomycetes determine the relevance of search for new producers and in-depth study of known microorganisms. Purpose: to determine the composition of enzymes in the culture liquid of strains; fractionation of protein complexes by gel filtration on Sephadex G-75 and comparison of their lytic activities. When determining the composition of enzymes in the culture fluid of the producers, it was found that all studied strains dissolved B. subtilis cells and only selected variants (S. recifensis 2P-15, P-29, 2.2 and 5.2) caused lysis of S. aureus cells. The yeast-lytic activity of streptomycetes was low, and in some strains (Streptomyces sp. 35, S. avermitilis AC-2179 and S. recifensis 6.2) it was not detected at all. The most active producer of proteinases was the rifampicin-resistant variant of S. recifensis 2P-15, and high amylolytic activity was demonstrated by variants of Streptomyces sp. 31, 2P-15 and P-29. Comparative analysis of lytic activity in the fractionation of enzymes on Sephadex G-75 showed that the most active is variant 2.2. It had the highest yield of staphylolytic activity for both high and low molecular weight proteins.Conclusions. Studies indicate a fairly high heterogeneity of the composition of enzyme complexes produced by streptomycetes. However, apparently, there are basic sets of genes encoding the most needful groups of enzymes, among which lytic enzymes, proteinases and amylase play an important role in the manifestation of antagonistic activity and food needs. Therefore, some of the studied strains can be use as objects for further optimization of enzyme synthesis, creation of overproducing strains and obtaining on their basis highly effective enzyme preparations.

streptomycetes, lytic enzymes, glycosidases, endopeptidases, proteinases, amylases, gel filtration.

1. Babenko LP, Sokolova IYe. Biosyntetychna aktyvnist transformanta Streptomyces resifensis. Visnyk DNU. 2009;1(7):10-4. [in Ukrainian].
2. Enany S, editоr. Basic Biology and Applications of Actinobacteria. London: IntechOpen Limited; 2018. 122 p. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72033
3. Gaydasheva II. Kultivirovanie shtamma Streptomyces lateritius 19/97 M: perspektivyi sozdaniya biopreparata dlya stimulyatsii rosta i zaschityi rasteniy ot bolezney [avtoreferat]. Moskva: Inst. lesa im. VN Sukacheva; 2011. 21 s. [in Russiаn].
4. Jain PK, Jain R, Jain PC. Production of industrially important enzymes by some actinomycetes producing antifungal compounds. Hindustan Antibiot Bull. 2003 Feb-2004 Nov;45-46(1-4):29-33.
5. Kachiprath B, Solomon S, Jayanath G, Philip R. Mangrove microflora as potential source of hydrolytic enzymes for commercial applications. Indian J Geomarine Sci. 2019 May;48(5):678-84.
6. Hopwood DA. Streptomyces in Nature and Medicine: The Antibiotic Makers. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. 272 p.
7. Theis T, Stahl U. Antifungal proteins: targets, mechanisms and prospective applications. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2004 Feb;61(4):437-55. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-003-3231-4
8. 8Varbanecz LD, Myshak KV, Macelyux OV, Gudzenko OV, Safronova LA, Pryxodko VO. α-amilazy Bacillus subtilis. Mikrobiol. zhur. 2006;68(2):30-8. [in Ukrainian].
9. Uyar F, Baysal Z, Dog M, Ru V. Purification and some characterization of an extracellular α-amylase from a thermotolerant Bacillus subtilis. Ann Microbiol. 2003 Jan;53(3):315-22.
10. Guglielmetti S, Zanoni I, Balzaretti S, Miriani M, Taverniti V, De Noni I, et al. Murein Lytic Enzyme TgaA of Bifidobacterium bifidum MIMBb75 Modulates Dendritic Cell Maturation through Its Cysteine- and Histidine-Dependent Amidohydrolase/Peptidase (CHAP) Amidase Domain. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Sep;80(17):5170-7. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00761-14
11. Aktuganov GE, Galimzyanova NF, Melentev AI, Kuzmina LYu. Vnekletochnyie gidrolazyi shtamma Bacillus sp. 739 i ih uchastie v lizise kletochnyih stenov mikromitsetov. Mikrobiologiya. 2007;76(4):471-9. [in Russiаn].
12. Yugina NA, Habibrahmanova AI, Mihaylova EO, Shulaev MV. Proteoliticheskaya aktivnost mikroorganizmov, vyidelennyih iz aktivnogo ila ochistnyih sooruzheniy MUP «Vodokanal» g. Kazani. Vestnik Kazan. teh-go un-ta. 2015;18(19):279-81. [in Russiаn].
13. Abdelwahed NAM, Danial NE, El-Ahmady El-Naggar N, Mohamed AA. Optimization of alkaline protease production by Streptomyces ambofaciens in free and immobilized form. Am J Biochem Biotechnol. 2013 Dec 28;10(1):1-13. DOI: 10.3844/ajbbsp.2014.1.13
14. Shaikh M, Shafique M, Naz S, Jabeen N, Nawaz H, Khan Z, et al. Streptomyces sp. MM-3 from rhizosphere of Psidium Guajava: A potential candidate for protease with dehairing properties. Pak J Bot. 2018;51(2):735-742.
15. Akhtar N, Mahmud ASM, Khan MS, Taznin T, Haque ME, Sultana S. Effects of Cultural Conditions on the Production of Extracellular Protease by Streptomyces albolongus and Streptomyces aburaviensis. Enzyme Engineering. 2013 Jan;2(2):10-5. DOI: 10.4172/2329- 6674.1000110
16. Jayasree D, Tadikamal S, Subba Rao CH, Venkateshwar Rao J, Narasu ML. Enhancement of alkaline protease production isoloated from Streptomyces pulveraceus using response surface methodology. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012 Jan;4(3):226-31.
17. Karpenko OV. Naukovi zasady stvorennya biotekhnologij poverkhnevoaktyvnykh rechovyn z polifunkcionalnymy vlastyvostyamy [avtoreferat]. Kyyiv: Nacz. kn-t kharch. tekhn; 2015. 44 s. [in Ukrainian].
18. Avizhenis VYu, Savitskayte IM. Nekotoryie svoystva proteoliticheskih fermentov preparatov. Trudyi AN Lit. SSSR ser. V. 1969;2(49):181- 91. [in Russiаn].
19. Doson R, Elliot D, Elliot U, Dzhons K. Spravochnik biohimika. Moskva: Mir; 1991. 544 s. [in Russiаn].
20. Sokolova IYe, Babenko YuS. Vyidelenie i ochistka liticheskih proteinaz iz Streptomyces recifensis var. lyticus 2435. Prikl. biohim. i mikrobiologiya. 1991;27(1):53-60. [in Russiаn].
21. Sokolova IE, Кylochek ТP, Vinnikov AI. A biosinthesis activity of soil streptomycete. Mikrob. zhurnal. 2004;66(6):10-7.

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 4 (158), 2020 year, 253-259 pages, index UDK 57:577.152.34:577.151.5:579:579.6

10.29254/2077-4214-2020-4-158-253-259