ORIGIN AND USE IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS OF SOME EPONYMS OF MEDICAL BIOLOGY

Yeroshenko H.A., Klepets O.V., Riabushko O.B., Vatsenko A.V., Ulanovska-Tsyba N. A., Kinash O.V., Shevchenko K.V.

MEDICAL EDUCATION

Scentific article

A special category of terms in medical biology are eponyms – concepts that are fully or partially formed from the proper names. Eponymous terms are an integral part of the professional language of medicine, where they are used to denote various anatomical and morphological structures, diseases, syndromes, reactions, operations, drugs, methods of diagnosis and treatment, etc. Students are better able to memorize complex eponymous terms if they understand their origin. However, such information is usually absent in the educational literature. In this regard, there is a need to focus teachers and students on the history of formation of some eponymous concepts on medical biology, as well as to determine the place of these terms in specific sections of the discipline. The aim of this work is to find out the origin of eponymous terms in molecular biology (Chargaff’s rules, Okazaki fragments, Robertsonian translocation, Morgan unit) and to analyze the possibilities of their use in the educational process. The obtained results showed the considered eponymous terms are widely used in the study of many topics from different sections of medical biology, including molecular biology, as well as integratively related to other theoretical disciplines. Finding out the origin of these terms, their connection with the personalities of scientists, the circumstances of scientific discoveries are prerequisitese for students to get deep theoretical knowledge on the discipline, their effective mastery of professional medical terminology, development of their logical thinking, scientific and cultural outlook. Besides the material of the article is recommended for in-depth study of medical biology, particularly, in preparing for the All-Ukrainian Student Subject Olympiad and organization of the students’ research work.

eponyms, medical-biological terminology, medical biology, molecular biology. molecular-genetic level of life organization.

1. Segen JC. The Dictionary of Modern Medicine. New Jersey: Carnforth; 1992. 800 р.
2. Tatarenko TD, Tokpanova AA, Lisaridi Ye K. O neobkhodimosti sushchestvovaniya eponimov v meditsinskoy terminologii. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamentalnykh issledovaniy. Filologicheskiye nauki. 2015;12:1140–1141. [in Russian].
3. Yeroshenko HA, Klepets OV, Riabushko OB, Vatsenko AV, Ulanovska-Tsyba NA, Perederii NO, Shevchenko KV. Pokhodzhennia i dydaktychne znachennia deiakykh eponimichnykh terminiv v kursi medychnoi biolohii. Visnyk problem biolohii i medytsyny. 2021;4(162):218–221. [in Ukrainian].
4. Riabushko OB, Yeroshenko HA, Klepets OV, Vatsenko AV, Ulanovska-Tsyba NA, Perederii NO. Eponimy u medychnii biolohii. Visnyk problem biolohii i medytsyny. 2021;2(160):161–164. [in Ukrainian].
5. Riabushko O. Eponimichni terminy v medychnii henetytsi. Aktualni problemy suchasnoi medytsyny: Visnyk Ukrainskoi medychnoi stomatolohichnoi akademii. 2020;20(1):172–176. [in Ukrainian].
6. Yaremii IM. Ervin Charhaff ta doslidzhennia struktury DNK [Internet]. Bukovynskyi derzhavnyi medychnyi universytet; 2018 [updated 2018 Apr 27]. Dostupno: https://www.bsmu.edu.ua/blog/6665-ervin-chargaff-ta-doslidzhennya-strukturi-dnk/. [in Ukrainian].
7. Vanyushin BF. Istoriya biologii s nachala XX veka do nashikh dnej. Moskva: Nauka; 1975. Chastyna, Molekulyarnaya biologiya; s. 318–324. [in Russian].
8. Burgers PM. Solution to the 50-year-old Okazaki-fragment problem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019;116(9):3358–3360. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1900372116. Available from: https://www.pnas.org/content/ pnas/116/9/3358.full.pdf.
9. Tsuneko & Reiji Okazaki Award. Professors Tsuneko and Reiji Okazaki and the Okazaki Fragment [Internet]. Tsuneko & Reiji Okazaki Award; 2015. [cited 2021 Dec 8]. Available from: https://www.itbm.nagoya-u.ac.jp/okazaki_award/okazaki_fragment.html.
10. Okazaki T, Okazaki R. Mechanism of DNA chain growth. IV. Direction of synthesis of T4 short DNA chains as revealed by exonucleolytic degradation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1969;64(4):1242– 1248. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.64.4.1242.
11. Bykov VL. Citologiya i obshchaya gistologiya. Sankt-Peterburg: Sotis; 2002. 520 s. [in Russian].
12. Koryakov DE, Zhimulev IF. Khromosomy. Struktura i funkcii. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo SO RAN; 2009. 258 s. [in Russian].
13. MakKonki EH. Genom cheloveka. Moskva: Tekhnosfera; 2011. 288 s. [in Russian].
14. Aref’ev VA., Lisovenko LA. Anglo-russkij tolkovyj slovar’ geneticheskikh terminov. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo VNIRO; 1995. 407 s. [in Russian].
15. Baza znanij po biologii cheloveka. Morganida [Internet]. Baza znanij po biologii cheloveka; [cited 2021 Dec 8]. Dostupno: http://humbio.ru/humbio/01122001/kartirovan/00005ac7.htm. [in Russian].
16. Richards JE, Hawley RS. The Gene Hunt: How Genetic Maps Are Built and Used in The Human Genome. 3rd ed. A User’s Guide. Academic Press; 2011. 420 p.
17. Wei Y, Lewis R, Naseri A, Zhang Sh, Zhi D. Responsible Genomic Data Sharing. Academic Press; 2020. Chapter 4, Genealogical search using whole-genome genotype profiles; p. 51–94.

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 2 Part 1 (164), 2022 year, 326-335 pages, index UDK 001.4–028.53:378.147:57.089

10.29254/2077-4214-2022-2-1-164-326-335