THE COMPARISON OF THE PARAMETERS BY CHEST CIRCUMFERENCE OF STUDENTS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS OF BUKOVINA DEPENDING ON THE SPORT

Karatieieva S. Yu., Slobodian O. M., Peryzhniak A. I., Slobodian K. V., Protsak T. D.

MORPHOLOGY

Scentific article

In order to establish the circumference of the chest of students of higher education institutions in Bukovina, depending on the sport, a study of anthropometric parameters on 129 first- and second-year students of higher education institutions in Chernivtsi, from 17 to 21 years. Of these, 83 (64.4%) were boys and 46 (35.6%) were girls, the main group was 89 (69%) students, the control group – 40 (31%). Students of the main group, in addition to physical activity, which was included in the program of their specialty, additionally engaged in the following sports: football – 40 (44.9%) students, volleyball – 18 (20.3%), tennis – 10 (11.2%), fitness – 9 (10.1%), basketball – 7 (7.9%), freestyle wrestling – 5 (5.6%). All students were subjected to anthropometric research, according to the method of V.V. Bunak in the modification of P.P. Shaparenko (determination of body length and weight) parameters and partial (chest circumference during inhalation, exhalation and at rest). Statistical analysis of the data was performed using a licensed program RStudio. So, in comparison, basketball players (93.14±3.0 cm, 82.71±3.0 cm, 89.00±3.0 cm) have the largest circumference of the chest (inhale, exhale and at rest), and students engaged in wrestling (92.00±3.0 cm, 82.00±3.0 cm, 87.40±3.0 cm), almost at the same level volleyball players (90.22±3.0 cm, 81,61±3.0 cm, 84.83±3.0 cm), and tennis players (89.70±3.0 cm, 79.00±3.0 cm, 85.00±3.0 cm), then soccer players (89.45±3.0 cm, 81.07±3.0 cm, 85.15±3.0 cm), and the least those who are engaged in fitness (82.66±3.0 cm, 75.77±3.0 cm, 77.44±3.0 cm). It was also found that a significant factor for the circumference of the chest when inhaling is weight and height, when exhaling and at rest is weight. Models for predicting chest circumference during inhalation are derived: y=70.499+0.639 * x1 – 0.133 * x2 , where y is chest circumference (inhalation), x1 is weight, x2 is height (coefficient of determination is 0.673); when exhaling: y=44,756+0,562 * x, where y is the circumference of the chest (exhalation), x is weight (coefficient of determination is 0.573); at rest y=47,034+0,575 * x, where y is the circumference of the chest (respiratory arrest), x is weight (coefficient of determination is 0.628).

athletes, anthropometry, chest circumference.

1. Cullen S, Fleming J, Logue DM, O’Connor J, Connor B, Cleary J, et al. Anthropometric profiles of elite athletes. Jurnal of Human Sport & Exercise. 2020;17(1):145-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2022.171.14.
2. Thomas D, Erdman K, Burke L. American College of Sports Medicine joint position statement. Nutrition and athletic performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2016;48(3):543-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000852.
3. Aragon AA, Schoenfield BJ, Wildman R, Kleiner S, Vandusseldorp T, Taylor L, et al. International society of sports nutrition position stand: diets and body composition. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2017;14:16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-017- 0174-y.
4. Perez AJ. Investigation: NFL improperly attempted to influence concussion research. USA Today Sports [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2016/05/23/nfl-concussion-research-investigation-nih /84787426/.
5. Gomez-Ezeiza J, Tam N, Torres-Unda J, Granados C, Santos-Concejero J. Anthropometric characteristics of top-class Olympic race walkers. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2019;59(3):429-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08363-9.
6. Budzhak VV. Biometriia: navch. posib. Chernivtsi: Chernivetskyi natsionalnyi universytet; 2016. 272 s. [in Ukrainian].
7. Sorokyn VA, Ponomarev YE. Rozvytye professyonalno – fyzkulturnыkh kompetentsyi po proektyrovanyiu ozdorovytelnыkh tekhnolohyi v systeme podhotovky spetsyalysta po fyzycheskomu vospytanyiu. Hosudarstvennoe y munytsypalnoe upravlenye. Uchenye zapysky. 2020;1:256-260. DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2020-1-1-256-260. [in Ukrainian].
8. Kendall KL, Fukada DH, Hyde PN, Smith-Ryan AE, Moon JR, Stout JR. Estimating fat-free mass in elite-level male rowers: a fourcompartment model validation of laboratory and field methods. Journal of Sports Science. 2017;35(7):624-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.10 80/02640414.2016.1183802.
9. Logue D, Madigan SM, Delahunt E, Heinen M, Mc Donnell SJ, Corish CA. Low Energy Availability in Athletes: A Review of Prevalence, Dietary Patterns, Physiological Health, and Sports Performance. Sports Medicine. 2018;48(1):73-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279- 017-0790-3.
10. Karatieieva SYu, Slobodian OM, Honchar HI, Penzai SA. Morfometrychni doslidzhennia v haluzi sportu. Klinichna anatomiia ta operatyvna khirurhiia. 2020;19(74):65-71. DOI: 10.24061/1727-0847.19.4.2020.54. [in Ukrainian].
11. Karatieieva SYu, Slobodian OM, Moseychuk YuYu, Hauriak OD, Goy RS. Study of anthropometric and morphometric parameters in the training of atheletes. Ukrainskyi zhurnal medytsyny, biolohii ta sportu. Mykolaiv. 2021;6(33):16-22. DOI: 10.26693/jmbs06.05.016. [in Ukrainian].
12. Karatieieva SYu, Slobodian OM, Moseychuk YuYu, Lavriv LP, Baidiuk MYu, Goy RS. Osoblyvosti pokaznykiv ekskursii ohruddia v studentiv zakladiv vyshchoi osvity. Klinichna anatomiia ta operatyvna khirurhiia. 2021;20(76):14-24. DOI: 10.24061/1727-0847.20.2.2021.14. [in Ukrainian].
13. Mountjoy M, Sundgot-Borgen J, Burke L, Ackerman KE, Blauwet C, Constantini N, et al. International Olympic Committee (IOC) Consensus Statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S): 2018 Update. International Journal of Sports Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. 2018;28(4):316-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0136.
14. Sanchez-Munoz C, Muros JJ, Belmonte O, Zabala M. Anthropometric characteristics, body composition and somatotype of elite male young runners. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(2):E674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph17020674.
15. Suydam SM, Cortes DH, Axe MJ. Semitendinosus tendon for ACL reconstruction: regrowth and mechanical property recovery. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5:2-11.
16. Sanchez-Munoz C, Muros JZ. World and olympic mountain bike champions’ anthropometry, body composition and somatotype. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2018;58(6):843-51.
17. Shaparenko PF. Antropometriia. Vinnytsia: Drukarnia Vinnytskoho derzhavnoho medychnoho universytetu im. M.I. Pyrohova; 2000. 71 s. [in Ukrainian].
18. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1952;47(260):583- 621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2280779.
19. Conover WJ, Iman RL. Multiple-comparisons procedures. Informal report [Internet]. United States; 1979. Available from: https://www.osti. gov/ servlets/purl/6057803.

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 2 Part 2 (165), 2022 year, 70-80 pages, index UDK 611.94.061-023.1-057.875:796

10.29254/2077-4214-2022-2-2-165-70-80