Rykov S. O., Venediktova O. A.

MARKERS OF APPEARANCE OF RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION AFTER CARDIOSURGICAL INTERVENTIONS USING ARTIFICIAL BLOOD CIRCULATION


About the author:

Rykov S. O., Venediktova O. A.

Heading:

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE

Type of article:

Scentific article

Annotation:

The main reasons for the development of retinal vein occlusion after cardiac surgery using artificial blood circulation (AC) is acute inflammation that occurs during and immediately after surgery and endothelial dysfunction. Aim of this study: to establish a relationship between markers of inflammation (IL-6 and IL-8) and endothelial dysfunction (VE-C) as possible factors for the occurrence of retinal vein occlusion after cardiac surgery using AC. Object and methods. The study included data from examination of 137 eyes (126 patients, the main group) with retinal vein occlusion after surgery with AC. The comparison group included examination data of 86 eyes (43 patients), which during the entire observation period (180 days) did not have retinal vascular occlusion. The control group consisted of 10 eyes (5 patients) without occlusion, which were examined before surgery. Patients were examined by an ophthalmologist 2, 7, 30, 60, 90 and 180 days after cardiac surgery. The content of IL-6, IL-8 and VE-C in blood serum was determined by enzyme immunoassay (Bender Medsystems, Austria). Statistical data processing was performed using the Statistica 10 software (StatSoft, Inc., USA). Results. Cardiac surgery using AC contributed to an increase in blood levels of IL-6 and VE-C in 1.1-1.2 times (p <0.05) compared with the level before the operation. In the presence of retinal vein occlusion, the content of these markers was increased more significantly (1.7–2.6 times; p <0.001). The content of IL-8 did not differ significantly from the control in both groups. In terms of the occurrence of occlusion, the content of IL-6 was constantly increased, and without occlusion, only on the 2nd and 7th day. The content of IL-8 was higher when occlusion occurred up to 30 days, and the content of VE-C significantly (2.0-2.2 times; p <0.001) exceeded the control in the later stages (after 30 days). For the occurrence of occlusion at all periods, IL-6 was important, from 2 to 60 days – IL-8, and from 30 days – VE-C. At 30 and 60 days, all markers were significant, which reflects the primary damaging effect of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction on these dates. Conclusions. In the postoperative period after cardiac surgery with AC, retinal vein occlusion has a different pathogenesis – acute inflammation in the early stages and secondary endothelial dysfunction – in the late ones, which necessitates various diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to the management of such patients.

Tags:

retinal vein occlusion, artificial blood circulation (cardiopulmonary bypass), IL-6, IL-8, VE-cadherin.

Bibliography:

  1.  Yuzurihara D, Iijima H. Visual outcome in central retinal and branch retinal artery occlusion. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2004 Sep-Oct;48(5):490-2.
  2. Park S, Choi N, Seo K, Park K, Woo S. Nationwide incidence of clinically diagnosed central retinal artery occlusion in Korea, 2008 to 2011. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(10):1933-8.
  3. Rogers S, McIntosh RL, Cheung N, Lim L, Wang JJ, Mitchell P. International Eye Disease Consortium. The prevalence of retinal vein occlusion: Pooled data from population studies from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:313-9.
  4. Ponto KA, Elbaz H, Peto T, Laubert-Reh D, Binder H, Wild PS, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of retinal vein occlusion: the Gutenberg Health Study. J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Jul;13(7):1254-63. DOI: 10.1111/jth.12982
  5. Ceruti P, Tosi R, Marchini G. Simultaneous bilateral retinal detachment following coronary artery bypass graft: case report. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 Sep-Oct;17(5):860-3.
  6. Nenekidis I, Pournaras C, Tsironi E, Tsilimingas N. Vision impairment during cardiac surgery and extracorporeal circulation: current understanding and the need for further investigation. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2012;90(3):168-72.
  7. Nuttall G, Garrity J. Risk factors for ischaemic opticneuropathy after cardiopulmonary bypass: a matched case /control study/. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:1410-6.
  8. Raphael J, Moss HE, Roth S. Perioperative Visual Loss in Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 May;33(5):1420-9. DOI: 10.1053/j. jvca.2018.11.035
  9. Roth S, Moss HE. Update on Perioperative Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Associated With Non-ophthalmic Surgery. Front Neurol. 2018 Jul 10;9:557. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00557. eCollection 2018.
  10. Kowalik MM, Lango R, Siondalski P, Chmara M, Brzeziński M, Lewandowski K, et al. Clinical, biochemical and genetic risk factors for 30-day and 5-year mortality in 518 adult patients subjected to cardiopulmonary bypass during cardiac surgery – the INFLACOR study. Acta Biochim Pol. 2018;65(2):241-50. DOI: 10.18388/abp.2017_2361
  11. Paunel-Görgülü A, Wacker M, El Aita M, Hassan S, Schlachtenberger G, Deppe A, et al. cfDNA correlates with endothelial damage after cardiac surgery with prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass and amplifies NETosis in an intracellular TLR9-independent manner. Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 12;7(1):17421. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17561-1
  12. Brettner F, Chappell D, Schwartz L, Lukasz A, Kümpers P, Becker BF, et al. Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction during Cardiac Surgery: On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary Surgery. Eur Surg Res. 2017;58(5-6):354-68. DOI: 10.1159/000480431
  13. Zhang J, Jiang Z, Bao C, Mei J, Zhu J. Cardiopulmonary bypass increases pulmonary microvascular permeability through the Src kinase pathway: Involvement of caveolin-1 and vascular endothelial cadherin. Mol Med Rep. 2016 Mar;13(3):2918-24. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2016.4831
  14. Dejana E, Orsenigo F, Lampugnani MG. The role of adherens junctions and VE-cadherin in the control of vascular permeability. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:2115-22. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.017897
  15. Orsenigo F, Giampietro C, Ferrari A, Corada M, Galaup A, Sigismund S, et al. Phosphorylation of VE-cadherin is modulated by haemodynamic forces and contributes to the regulation of vascular permeability in vivo. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1208. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2199
  16. Tsakiridis K, Zarogoulidis P, Vretzkakis G, Mikroulis D, Mpakas A, Kesisis G, et al. Effect of lornoxicam in lung inflammatory response syndrome after operations for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Mar;6(1):7-20. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.12.30
  17. Warren OJ, Smith AJ, Alexiou C, Rogers PL, Jawad N, Vincent C, et al. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: part 1--mechanisms of pathogenesis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Apr;23(2):223-31. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.08.007
  18. Rykov SO, Venediktova OA. Oklyuziyi sudyn sitkivky pislya kardiokhirurhichnykh vtruchan z vykorystannyam shtuchnoho krovoobihu. Arkhiv oftalmolohiyi Ukrayiny. 2018;2:32-8. [in Ukrainian].
  19. Jongman RM, Zijlstra JG, Kok WF, van Harten AE, Mariani MA, Moser J, et al. Off-pump CABG surgery reduces systemic inflammation compared with on-pump surgery but does not change systemic endothelial responses: a prospective randomized study. Shock. 2014 Aug;42(2):121-8. DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000190
  20. Rossaint J, Berger C, Van Aken H, Scheld HH, Zahn PK, Rukosujew A, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass during cardiac surgery modulates systemic inflammation by affecting different steps of the leukocyte recruitment cascade. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45738. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0045738
  21. Feng J, Liu Y, Singh AK, Ehsan A, Sellke N, Liang J, et al. Effects of diabetes and cardiopulmonary bypass on expression of adherens junction proteins in human peripheral tissue. Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):823-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.057
  22. Okutani D, Lodyga M, Han B, Liu M. Src protein tyrosine kinase family and acute inflammatory responses. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006;291:L129-L141. DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00261.2005

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 1 (155), 2020 year, 193-199 pages, index UDK 616.145.154-065.6+617.7-07-06:[616.126.32:616.132:616.132.2]

DOI: