Radchenko V. O., Piontkovskyi V. K., Zlatіv V. P., Myronyk B. M., Kasianchuk V. M.

MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT OF LATERAL STENOSES OF THE LUMBAR SPINE


About the author:

Radchenko V. O., Piontkovskyi V. K., Zlatіv V. P., Myronyk B. M., Kasianchuk V. M.

Heading:

METHODS AND METHODOLOGIES

Type of article:

Scentific article

Annotation:

This research analyses 150 clinical cases of surgical treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis in patients who underwent endoscopic transforaminal decompression in the Department of Minimally Invasive and Instrumental Spine Surgery of the State Institution “Professor Sitenko Centre for Spinal and Joint Disorders of the Ukrainian Academy of Medical Science” and in the Regional Centre of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Vertebrology of the Public Healthcare Institution “Rivne Regional Clinical Hospital” from April 2016 to December 2019. Following this technique, under local anaesthesia and with the help of the optoelectronic converter a spinal needle was placed on the top of the lateral facet and with the help of the needle a guide wire was inserted through which a TOM Shidi needle was introduced. Then, into the lumen of the TOM Shidi needle a guide wire was again inserted and the TOM Shidi needle was removed. After that, a foraminotomy was performed through the guide wire by the alternate introduction of blunt end bone drills from the MaxMore set of instruments, and then the working cannula with the endoscope were inserted to allow the visual control of the performed foraminotomy. The remains of the hypertrophied capsule and the ligamentum flavum were removed using a Trigger-flex radiofrequency electrode. In the end, the herniated content and nerve root were visualized and hernia was removed by a mini-clipper and a radiofrequency electrode. However, this technique is not universal and cannot be applied to all patients. Considerable practical experience has shown that surgeons may encounter certain technical difficulties with foraminal stenosis in the first zone and in some cases the access at L5-S1 level may be difficult due to the high standing of the iliac wing, the instability of functional spinal units (FSU) at the operated level, severe central stenosis of the spinal canal and distant cranial or caudal migration of free sequesters. However, if there are correct indications, this minimally invasive technique allows solving the problem of radicular compression syndrome in foraminal stenosis in a short time with minimal soft tissue damage and minimal contact with nerve structures.

Tags:

foraminal stenosis, intervertebral disc hernia, endoscopic decompression.

Bibliography:

  1. Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. New Engl. J. Med. 1934;211:210-5.
  2. Caspar W. A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach. In: Wüllenweber R, Brock M, Hamer J, editors. Advances in Neurosurg.; 1977. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1977. p. 74-7. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-642-66578-3_15
  3. Kambin P, editor. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy: minimal intervention in spinal surgery. Baltimore: Urban and Schwerzenberg; 1991. p. 3-8.
  4. Hoogland T. Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy with forminoplasty for lumbar disc herniation. Surg Tech Orthop Traumatol. 2003;40(40):55- 120.
  5. Hoogland T, Scheckenbach C. Die endoskopische transforminale diskektomie bei lumbalen bandscheibenforfallen. Orthop Prax. 1998;34:352- 5.
  6. Hoogland T, Schubert M, Miklitz B, Ramirez A. Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a low-dose chymopapain: a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases. Spine. 2006 Nov 15;31(24):890-7.
  7. Rutten S. Endoscopic lumbar disc surgery. In: Vieweg U, Grochulla F, editors. Manual of Spine Surgery. Berlin, Heidel-berg: Springler-Verlag; 2012. p. 303-8.
  8. Ahn Y. Outcome predictors of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain. Acta Neurochir (Wein). 2010 Oct;152(10):1695-702. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0726-2
  9. Wang H, Huang B, Li C, Zhang Z, Wang J, Zheng W, et al. Learning curve for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy depending on the surgeon’s training level of minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Oct;115(10):1987-91. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.06.008
  10. Lee S, Kim SK, Lee SH, Kim WJ, Choi WC, Choi G, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation: classification of disc migration and surgical approaches. Eur. Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):431-7.
  11. Komp M, Hahn P, Oezdemir S. Operation of lumbar zygoapophyseal joint cyst using a full-endoscopic inter-laminar and transforaminal approach: prospective 2-year results of 74 patients. Surg. Innov. 2014 Dec;21(6):605-14.
  12. Komp M, Hahn P, Oezdemir S. Bilateral decompression of lumbar central stenosis using the full-endoscopic inter-laminar technique: a prospective, randominized, controlled study. Pain Physician. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):61-70.
  13. Rutten S, Hahn P, Oezdemir S. Current status of full – endoscopic techniques in the surgical treatment of disc herniation and spinal canal stenosis. Chines Journal of Bone and Joint. 2014;8:571-84.
  14. Rutten S, Komp M, Haben P, Oezdemir S. Decompression of lumbar lateral spinal stenosis: full – endoscopic, interlaminar technique. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2013 Feb;25(1):31-46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-012-0195-2
  15. Rutten S. Endoscopic disk and decompression surgery. Іn: Haertl R, Korge A, editors. AO – Spine – Minimally invasive Spine. Techniques, Evidence, and Controversies. Stuttgard, New York: Thieme; 2012. p. 315-30.
  16. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after conventional discectomy: a prospective, randomized study comparing fullendoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal versus microsurgical revision. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Apr;22(2):122-9. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318175ddb4
  17. Suess O, Brock M, Kombos T. Motor nerve root monitoring during percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic sequestrectomy under general anaesthesia for intra- and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation. Zentralbl Neurochir. 2005;66:190-201.
  18. Bhaisare R, Kamble B, Patond K. Long-Term Results of Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy by “Destandau’s Technique”. Asian spine Journal. 2016;10(2):289-97. Available from: https://doi. org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.289
  19. Lewandrowski KU. “Outside-in” technique, clinical results, and indications with transforaminal lumbar endoscopic surgery: a retrospective study on 220 patients on applied radiographic classification of foraminal spinal stenosis. International journal of spine surgery. 2014;8(26). Available from: https://doi.org/10.14444/1026
  20. Chiu JC. Evolving transforaminal endoscopic microdecompression for herniated lumbar discs and spinal stenosis. Surg Technol Int. 2004;13(4):276-86.
  21. Kafadar A, Kahraman S, Akboru M. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy: a critical appraisal. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2006;49(1):44-9.

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 1 (155), 2020 year, 255-259 pages, index UDK 616.711-003.8-089.2(06)

DOI: