Piontkovskiy V. K.

INTRAOPERATIVE DETERMINATION OF THE INSTABILITY OF THE FUNCTIONAL SPINAL UNITS OF THE LUMBAR SPINE IN MIDDLE-AGED AND ELDERLY PATIENTS


About the author:

Piontkovskiy V. K.

Heading:

METHODS AND METHODOLOGIES

Type of article:

Scentific article

Annotation:

The author proposes a new method of intraoperative determination of the instability of the functional spinal units in middle-aged and elderly patients based on the measurement of distraction interosseous distance. The study was carried out in 2 groups of patients: the first group consisted of patients with the diagnosed instability of the functional spinal units in the preoperative period according to functional radiographs; the second group consisted of patients without the instability of the functional spinal units in the preoperative period according to functional radiographs. In the group of patients with the stable forms of osteochondrosis it was revealed that the value of the distraction of the interosseous spaces didn’t exceed 4 mm and during the laminectomy at the same level with resection of the supraosseous and interosseous ligaments it didn’t exceed 7 mm. In the group of patients with the unstable forms of osteochondrosis it was revealed that the value of the distraction of the interosseous spaces exceeded 4 mm and in patients with laminectomy at 1 level it exceeded 7 mm. The interosseous hypermobility (and therefore instability), increases in direct proportion to the loss of the substance of the disc and increases dramatically with a loss of >1.8-2 cubic centimetres. Another factor that affected the interstitial distraction distance was the volume of posterior decompression, which increased especially sharply during the unilateral and bilateral facetectomy. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that in patients with severe pain syndrome when is impossible to carry out functional radiography in the preoperative period, it is possible to diagnose the presence of instability by means of a distraction interosseous test.

Tags:

insability of the functional spinal units

Bibliography:

  1. Jonson B, Stromqvist B. Lumbar spine surgery in elderly: complicftions and surgical results. Spine. 1994;(19):1431-5.
  2. Jonson B, Stromqvist B. Influens of age on symptoms and sings in lumbar disc herniation. Eur. Spine J. 1995;(4):202-5.
  3. Ray-Camille R, Saillant J, Mazel C. Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop. 1986;(203):7-17.
  4. Bailey S. Bartolizzi P, Bertagnoli R. The BWM spinal fixator system. A preliminary report of a 2 year prospective, international multicenter study in a sange of indications requiring surgical intervention for bone grafting and pedicle screw fixation. Spine. 1996;(21):2006-15.
  5. MacMillan M, Cooper R, Haid R. Lumbar and lumbosocral fusions using Cotrel-Dubosset pedicle screws and rods. Spine. 1994;(19):430-4.
  6. Zdeblick T. A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results. Spine. 1993;(18):983-91.
  7. Juan H, Jarfin R, Dickman C. A historical cohort study of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal fusion. Spine. 1994;(19):2279-96.
  8. Chapman J, Hanson B, Dettori J, Norvell D. Spine outcomes, measures and instruments. Thieme: 2007. 289 p.
  9. Prodan AI. Stenoz pojasnichnogo otdela pozvonochnogo canala [dissertatsya]. Harkiv: Harkivskiy naukovo-doslidnuy institut travmatologii ta ortopedii; 1994. 421 s. [in Russiаn].
  10. McAfee P, Weiland D, Carlow J. Survivoship analysis of pedicle spinal instrumentation. Spine. 1991;(16):422-7.
  11. West J, Oqilvie J, Bradford S. Complications of the variable screw plate pedicle screw fixation. Spine. 1991;(16):76-9.
  12. Schwab F, Nazarian D, Mahmud F, Michelsen C. Effect of spinal instrumentation a fusion of the lumbosacral spine. Spine. 1995;(20):2023-8.
  13. Qiu GX, Xu H, Weng X. Adjacent segment disease after spine fusion and instrumentation. Spine. 2005;27(2):249-53.
  14. Chou W. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2002;122(1):39-43.
  15. Magerl F. External skeletal fixation of the lover thoracic and the lumbar spine In. Current concepts of external fixation of fractures. New York Springer; 1982. p. 352-66.
  16. Spengler D. Instrumented Fusion of the Degenerative Lumbar Spine. Fusion of the lumbosacral Spine: An Excellent Treatment Option for Selected Patients with a Variety of Spinal Disorders. Thieme; 1996. p. 291-305.

Publication of the article:

«Bulletin of problems biology and medicine» Issue 1 Part 1 (148), 2019 year, 237-240 pages, index UDK 616.711-018.3:617-08-036.868

DOI: